In academic writing, the Rogerian model for writing an argumentative paper is commonly used. Let’s dive deeper into the difference between Rogerian and classic arguments based on an essay example.

Here is a little bit of information to understand why Rogerian argument format is so specific. Overall, a Rogerian argument is named after Carl Rogers. He was a famous humanistic psychologist who developed a person-centered approach to therapy.

The main essence of the Rogerian argumentative paper is its unbiased expression of the writer’s position with respect for the oppossing views.

Whereas the classic argumentative essay puts foward an argument as a strong one proving that the opposite side is wrong, the Rogerian type presupposes that opponents may be also right but gives evidence why the discussed argument may be beneficial in certain contexts and situations.

Format Based on Rogerian Argument Essay Example

Introduction

Present the issue raising debates:

For example, healthcare is a right or a privilage.

Answering this question will help both sides leading to a positive result. Therefore, discussing the issue should be beneficial for proponents and opponents.

Account of Opposing Views

Describe what opponents state about the issue:

For example, several paragraphs about arguments for healthcare as a right (if your side is healthcare is a privilage).

It is important to show acceptance of these views and respect for opponents using the neutral tone of discussion.

Acceptance of Opposing Views

The writer should acknowledge the opposite side and show that it is also right considering certain circumstances.

Describe such situations where you agree that such views can be right.

Presentation of Your Argument

After giving an insight into the opposite position, the writer should present his or her point of view and conditions under which it is right.

Reasons why the Reader Should Support Your Position

Finally, the last part is a conclusion presenting advantages and reasons why the reader will benefit from supporting the writer’s argument. It should strictly underline strengths of your position only without highighting weaknesses of opposing views.

Note

Therefore, the Rogerian argumentative essay can be even more persuasive than the classic format because it has a neutral tone, highlights strengths of writer’s views, and respect for the opposite side. Learn about Toulmin argument structure for comparison.